August 1, 2006

Ignatieff Back With a Bang…Tells Israel it Needs to Stop Shooting

Vindication is sooo sooo sweet.

All I can say is WOW. Michael Ignatieff’s Op/Ed in today’s Globe and La Presse was all the proof I need to determine this man can defeat Stephen Harper. Although we are several weeks into the conflict, Michael Ignatieff is the first to propose a concrete solution. The bombing in Cana showed the devastation that this conflict can lead to. The statement is loaded with nuggets of powerful statements and because I am so happy my leadership candidate is on the same side as I am, I will break them down for you.

“The terrible tragedy in Qana, which claimed 57 lives, is thus a victory for Hezbollah. But that is not all. Hezbollah then hopes to draw Israel into a wider conflict which would result in its ultimate destruction. In this terrible struggle, Israel cannot win, Hezbollah cannot lose and Lebanon perishes.”

Making the distinction between Lebanon and Hezbollah is very important. Israel claims to have been bombing Hezbollah so far. However, any neutral observer will tell you now that Hezbollah is stronger than ever, the Lebanese government is powerless, and that the bombings have destroyed the country of Lebanon, but not Hezbollah.

“If Israel persists, there is a danger that it will lose control of the situation. Hezbollah cannot be wiped out militarily. They have support among Lebanese Shiites, because they provide social welfare and have the blessing of the mullahs. They also have political power, having won parliamentary seats in free elections. Further military action by Israel may only strengthen Hezbollah’s political power in Lebanon.”

Oh It gets better…

“Israel must not play Hezbollah’s game. It must defend itself, but to persist in its military campaign would only give Hezbollah what it wants: continuing carnage in Lebanon and weakening world support for Israel. Canada should be saying to Israel that there are no further military options in Lebanon that do not risk destroying Lebanon and ultimately endangering its own security.”

Canada should tell Israel to stop bombing…hmm…well Steve, grit heart, shoshana, and Michelle, we now have a divergence of opinion. Luckily, Ignatieff is on the right side of this one.

You can crap on Michael for seeing ailing relatives, although I find it slightly unclassy. However, give the man credit, he is the first to propose a solution and it is a fantastic one to boot.

“It’s time for Canada to do its part in stopping this march to the abyss. It should call for an immediate cease-fire, authorized by the Security Council. It should line up with the Europeans and moderate Arab states issuing the same call. Under such a cease-fire deal, Israeli forces would withdraw, aerial bombardment would cease and Hezbollah would stop rocket attacks and incursions into Israeli territory.
Once a cease-fire has taken hold, Canada should propose the deployment of an international naval, air and land force to prevent the movement of missiles and other military technology into Lebanon. These weapons come by land through Syria and by sea through the Mediterranean. Such a force should be deployed at all Lebanese ports and land borders. An additional naval force should patrol Lebanese waters. The force should be authorized by the UN Security Council to seize any weapons destined for Hezbollah or any non-state actor in the region.
Such a force would not engage in direct confrontation with Hezbollah or with the Israelis but patrol a buffer zone between them. Canada’s commitments in Afghanistan preclude sending ground troops on this mission, but Canada could participate in the naval interdiction effort in the Mediterranean. Canada’s navy has already played this role in the Gulf and would be well equipped to do so again”

Using multilateralism is the only way to disarm Hezbollah. It worked extremely well when British and Irish police sought to disarm the IRA. Israel has made it so that Hezbollah has more authority than the Lebanese government. With an international force in place, Israel can rest assured that Hezbollah is being targeted and the Lebanese government can re-build its authority over the region.

“The goal here is limited but vital: to create demilitarized zones between combatants and to bar the entry of the advanced weaponry that risks widening the local conflict into a regional conflagration. Once a cease-fire is in place, and the interdiction force deployed, Canada could form a ‘friends of Lebanon’ club, a group of states to work with the Lebanese government to reconstruct the country’s shattered infrastructure. Germany played this role after the Afghanistan war of 2001, and Canada could play the same role in Lebanon.”

Creating a “Friends of Lebanon” would prop up the Lebanese government again and proves once and for all that supporting Lebanon is NOT supporting Hezbollah. Israel itself should be supporting Lebanon. It is only the Lebanese government that can root out Hezbollah but it needs everybody’s help as the task is even more difficult now.

Michael ends the Op/Ed with a passage that left me breathless. It proved to me why the man is not only capable of beating Harper, but capable of taking Canada to the next level.

“We are a country of peace-makers, especially because we are also a country of immigrants, many of whom have come to Canada to escape the horrors of conflict. As a nation of immigrants from the zones of war, we have a special vocation for peace, and it is by exercising this vocation that we maintain our unity as a people. We have a voice that other countries listen to. Let us use it.”

13 Commentaires:

Blogger Anthony a dit...

By that logic, I have also been backing Israel all this time...

8/01/2006 11:42 a.m.  
Blogger Jason Townsend a dit...

Intriguing change of pace, Grit Heart. lol.

8/01/2006 11:47 a.m.  
Blogger Peter Loewen a dit...

Thomas: Are you serious? One is a state with sovereignty. The other is a rogue militia. Who cares if they provide medical service? They can continue to do it without holding on to 10000 rockets.

Just to test this logic, if my friends and I buy some highpowered weaponry and a free lemonade stand that my neighbours love, do we have the right to remain armed?

8/01/2006 1:20 p.m.  
Blogger S.K. a dit...

Vindication?? Your candidate is obviously a follower and not a leader on this one. Three weeks late is, well, three weeks late. Stating the obvious isn't exactly rocket science either. Yeah I agree with Grit Heart. Iggy has called for the disarming of Hezbollah, which is Israel's position, not yours Antonio.

PS. Did you read my comment that Israeli defence force states that the closest bombardment to Qanna was 1 KM away. I'd be very interested to have international bomb experts go in there and decide whose armaments went of and whether the building was bombed from bottom up, or top down. I seem to recall seeing a picture of the buiding with its top floor intact and its bottom floors collapsed. Will you change your opinion iof it turns out Hezbollah killed those women and children with their arms stores, either accidentally, or deliberately, to gain internationaly sympathy?

8/01/2006 1:59 p.m.  
Blogger ottlib a dit...

All in all a rather predictable statement and I should note the comments about it on the blogs are rather predictable as well.

Now that we have Dr. Ignatieff's statement on the current Middle East crisis maybe the Liberals can get on with choosing a leader.

8/01/2006 2:30 p.m.  
Blogger WesternGrit a dit...

Kudos Fuddle Duddle. Great comments. Mr. Ignatieff's statements are clear, well-thought out (not attempts at sound-bites), and carefully consider the regional geo-politics. Just what I would expect from this man. Hizbollah certainly can remain - as a political party (a'la Sinn Fein) - but, it must be dismantled as a guerrilla army (I prefer the term guerrilla to "terrorist" - which is over-used by hawks now-a-days).

In reading Ignatieff's books, I was certain he would come out with such a complex and pragmatic approach, and he certainly didn't disappoint. Can't wait for him to take on Shrub.

8/01/2006 3:04 p.m.  
Blogger Anthony a dit...

Thomas

I hope your views are not shared by others on the Kennedy campaign.

western grit

I agree that hezbollah as a political organization can survive. The social services they provide in Southern Lebanon can remain if they choose to disarm. It might be the solution the Lebanese people will want from Hezbollah. We will have to wait and see.

However, they must be disarmed. I have said this all along. We must not let a political organization take over a country. Lebanon is a free state and the international community must step up and help them regain authority from Hezbollah in their sovereign territory. I think the Friends of Lebanon is a great idea. Hopefully, Israel can participate in a show of solidarity.

8/01/2006 3:50 p.m.  
Blogger KC a dit...

Wow! Shocking! Ignatieff has a well thought out position on his area of expertise--foreign affairs. Too bad he was too busy frolicing around the globe to learn about domestic Canadian politics.

8/01/2006 5:10 p.m.  
Blogger S.K. a dit...

Phil what problem do you have with international experts investigating this situation? Are you afraid I might be right and you won't be able to spew crap anymore.

8/01/2006 6:03 p.m.  
Anonymous Anonymous a dit...

This comment has been removed by the author.

8/01/2006 9:07 p.m.  
Blogger Tarek a dit...

If the US Congress is right, then everyone who might not agree is an antisemite! I applaud your logic. Aristotle must be turning over in his grave.

8/02/2006 12:05 a.m.  
Anonymous Anonymous a dit...

This comment has been removed by the author.

8/02/2006 12:22 a.m.  
Blogger Anthony a dit...

Grit
there has been a death in the family and I have been away from the computer.

While insensitive, Michael's comment was in fact quite realistic for someone with his experience. Read any of his accounts of the atrocities in the former Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq and I wonder how he sleeps at night at all.

8/03/2006 1:54 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home